2010年10月10日星期日

情色學堂:「理.論」親密關係微型課程

dp albert>>>>情色學堂:「理.論」親密關係微型課程已於117日下午順利完成。小曹深入淺出地分享了極具前瞻性的內容,讓學員大開眼界,思想「出軌」。在此衷心向啟蒙老師小曹致謝!


dirty press:截止報名日期為10月8日,報名請從速!!!




dirty press x 女同學社

藉你我她∕他零碎的經驗,理論的批判力度,
打開親密關係的更多可能性


情色學堂:「理.論」親密關係微型課程
小曹主理

幾乎所有人都曾經仰天慨嘆「問世間情為何物」,究竟親密關係在當代社會有什麼意義呢?這個超微型的課程將為在愛海中顛簸浮沉的有情眾生,提供超濃縮的理論概覽,不單從你我她∕他零碎的經驗印證理論,還要借理論的批判力度,打開更多的人生可能。

我們將會從社會學家Anthony Giddens筆下的「晚期現代性」(late modernity)出發,回顧一下現代社會如何重組親密關係,而你我的尋常愛慾又如何倒過頭來,令社會更加現代。究竟在現代社會,親密關係會像 Giddens所樂觀預言,變得更加民主,還是如Lynn Jamieson所說,其實根本沒有出現什麼大轉變,也不見得有解放力量?跟Giddens相似,Zygmunt Bauman提出了「液態現代性」(liquid modernity)之後也轉攻親密關係。如果「現代性」有如液體般流竄不定,沖毀沿途一切,親密關係會否撞到焦頭爛額、體無完膚呢?

另一邊廂,情慾出軌的性異議者紛紛自在出櫃,那些一腳踏多船、實踐開放關係、熱衷性愛的濫交「達人」,既向我們示範情慾生命的豐盛,也用身體開闢一條非單一直線的人生路徑。我們將在本課後半部分借用「道德浪女」和何春蕤「豪爽女人」的眼界,尋找突破常規的能量,也會從行文幽默風趣的Laura Kipnis學習尖酸刻薄的語言,「反對愛情」。

小曹:全名曹文傑,香港中文大學性別研究博士候選人,活躍於香港同志及性權運動,早年加入中大同志文化小組及香港十分一會,現為女同學社執行幹事。05年,有見保守宗教勢力抬頭,與六人籌組「女同學社」,實踐批判的文化介入工作。06年成立「還我本色」連線,以性權為運動核心,積極回應反挫力量,曾反對設立性罪犯名冊,抗議收緊淫審法例,並持續監察宗教右派。

女同學社:www.leslovestudy.com

對象:大專畢業生;正讀大專的學生;不抗拒理論語言,對社會學理論有初步掌握者。

日期︰2010年10月10日、17日、31日、11月7日(星期日)
時間:下午3時至5時
地點:后花園(九龍尖沙咀山林道9號卓能中心1103室)
費用:港幣400元
名額︰20人(名額有限,先到先得,額滿即止。恕不接受即場報名及「散報」。7人開班。)

報名方式
一、電郵:dirtypress.course@gmail.com
==================================
主題:報讀情色學堂:「理.論」親密關係微型課程
姓名:
電話:
地址:
報名人數:___ 人
付款方式(請選一項):
1. 銀行轉帳;或
2. 郵寄支票。
==================================

二、電話報名:
dirty press 6058 8944


Share |

性別國手——訪問袁維昌醫生

明報 P06  |   什麼人訪問什麼人  |   By 小曹 2010-10-10

性別國手——訪問袁維昌醫生

十 月五日早上,從新聞知道變性人婚權的司法覆核案將於當天宣判,我與友人屏息靜氣,回來瀏覽即時新聞。十時許,收音機傳來壞消息—— 「司法覆核敗訴」。我在○七年曾經興訟,就廣管局對香港電台《鏗鏘集》發出強烈勸喻抱不平。因身繫官司而忐忑不安,我甚有同感,對於訴訟勝敗的執著,更有 切膚感受。如今,爭取變性人婚權的第一仗雖敗陣而還,但它卻驅使輿論放下獵奇心態,正面認識跨性別,總算為這個絕不平坦的平權運動添加動力。傳媒近日追訪 多名變性人,翻開一個又一個綻放頑強生命力的故事。縱然各人命途有異,但都在生命的某一個關鍵時刻碰上同一個他——袁維昌醫生。

文小曹   攝影 朱永倫

接 受外科訓練的袁醫生一九八七年在英國學成歸來,首數年服務於瑪麗醫院,九二年轉到律敦治醫院,並一直懸壺至今。他憶述求學時從沒想過會替人施變性手術,亦 未有機會親身觀看這類手術過程。「當年念外科,不像今天那樣拆分仔細,變成一個又一個獨立的外科專科;我基本上什麼都要讀,掌握了技巧,無論用於頭還是腳 也是一樣貫通的。」八七年,剛好學成回港,袁的上司泌尿科專科醫生黃國基便指派他負責一宗由女變男(female-to-male,或簡稱FTM)的變性 手術,萬料不到的是,這次手術使袁醫生與跨性別群體結下不解之緣,亦令他走上一條「不尋常」的醫生生涯。

「以往行醫時往往將自己跟病人的關係想得比較單純,作為外科醫生,我只會專注手術和病人的身體,但這宗官司令我思考其他事,例如什麼是婚姻。」

過 去十年,經他的巧手轉換性別的人有廿九位(男變女佔廿二位),但變性手術複雜,不能於同一次手術內完成,所以累積下來便有七十多宗大大小小、涉及不同身體 部位的手術。雖然早年有些私家醫院也有變性手術,但近年已經逐漸式微,而在公立醫院進行的,都由他「一手包辦」。也許熟能生巧,要說最深刻難忘的一宗,恐 怕必然是在全無實戰經驗下上陣的第一宗變性手術。「那時只知原理,但無實戰經驗,幸而得到很多同事的熱心幫忙,才能成功。但做手術時仍有股怪怪的感覺,鋒 利的手術刀下不是因為病變需要切除的身體組織,而是那些仍然運作健康正常的器官。」然而,那名病人康復後寄來的一張心意卡,卻釋除了袁醫生的困惑,卡上寫 着的「your surgery makes my heart sing」成為他往後從事變性手術、精益求精的推動力。這種「亦醫亦友」的情份得來不易,離開手術台,變性人待康復後便展開人生新的一頁,而袁醫生亦慢慢 了解這個跨性別社群,只是,關係並沒有從最後一口縫針宣告結束,手術室紅燈熄滅只是預示新關係的開始。「她∕他們很信賴我們,康復後,即使傷風感冒,也會 回來,有時也會閒話家常。手術過後,她∕他們就跟平常男女並無太大分別,跟你我一樣,也要面對尋常生活。」

轉介到袁維昌 醫 生主管的外科部門,對尋求變性的跨性別人士來說,算是整個程序的最後一步。跨性別(transgender)是一個總稱,包含易服(cross- dressing)、扮裝(transvestite)及變性(transsexual)。現時精神醫學將不滿自己原生性別的心理界定為「性別認同障 礙」(gender identity disorder),到目前為止,唯一有效的治療方案便是透過手術,將身體改造成患者自我認同的性別。「這個病症很特別,一般的疾病診斷都是由醫生主導, 但性別認同障礙卻剛好相反,要由患者主動向醫生說明自己的狀况,醫學界亦無統一的檢定標準和方法,只能依靠長時期的評估和跟進。」由精神科醫生、臨牀心理 學家及醫務社工等專家組成的評估小組,會觀察尋求變性的跨性別人士在最少兩年內能否以異性身分正常過活,融入社會。若在「現實生活測 試」(real life test)期間仍然展示持續且強烈的變性欲望,就有機會轉介予袁醫生做變性手術。可以說,袁醫生所接觸到的是那些「過五關斬六將」,最終獲批准做變性手術 的跨性別人士,所以只是佔整個跨性別群體的少數。袁醫生解釋,患有「性別認同障礙」而決心變性的人(pre-opt 或pre-operative),從青春期開始已經處處感到壓力,一方面來自手術前的漫長等待和繁瑣的評估程序,另一方面則是隱藏原生性別性徵的困難和時 時刻刻擔心身分敗露的風險。「準備由男變女的pre-op 經常擔心被警察截查,質問她們何以男扮女裝,或出入女廁,警員很可能對『性別認同障礙』缺乏基本認識。」

本地首宗就變性人 婚權的司法覆核案 件在剛過去的星期二宣判,雖然法官對變性人的遭遇表示同情,但事與願違,法官採取了相當保守的詮釋策略,將《婚姻條例》中的男女牢牢的鎖緊在原生生理性別 的框框內,不但變相排除同性婚姻的可能,也拒絕接納以變性手術後的新性別跟異性結婚。這單官司,以至近年剛剛起步的跨性別平權運動,都促使袁醫生反思自己 作為外科醫生的社會位置: 「以往行醫時往往將自己跟病人的關係想得比較單純,作為外科醫生,我只會專注手術和病人的身體,但這宗官司令我思考其他事,例如什麼是婚姻。」他續說: 「普遍的人仍然認為婚姻要一男一女。容許變性人結婚當然令她∕他們感覺完美一點,但論到伴侶還是法例認可更重要,似乎是前者。大部分變性人都很難找伴侶, 因為即使找到,也會猶豫應否向對方坦白。」

「法官的定義似乎過窄,不能滿足現實情况。但說到底,我還是同意法官的建議,交由立法會及政府制定合適的法例。」

的 確,婚姻和家庭都是情緒字,因為它們涉及實際的利益分配和各種權利的賦予與獲取,更牽動眾人長期投放在這兩個制度的心理投資,佔有慾與排他傾向由此而生。 於是,法官把婚權爭議設定為大眾是否容許小眾加入屬於他們的婚姻制度,而不是探討本來人人均享的結婚自由是否因小眾身分而被無理剝奪。袁醫生坦言,要社會 以至法例完全接納跨性別群體確是漫漫長路,但是,認可新的親密關係之餘又要迴避修改婚姻制度帶來的社會震盪,其實並非別無他法,例如一些地方已經設立性別 中立的伴侶註冊制度。「修法雖然漫長,但也不是遙遙無期,現在變性人可以修改身分證的性別,也許未來可以更改的更多,至於如何實現,就考驗立法者的新智慧 了。」性別對這位專科醫生而言不再是生物決定論的概念,二元對立的框框亦容不下他在廿多個寒暑裏有緣相遇的性別多元。高院法官對性別的二元解讀,他不表認 同: 「法官的看法窄了點,不能套在所有人身上,因為社會上存在一群小眾,她∕他們對性別有另一些感覺。我剛剛翻過放在辦公室裏的一本舊字典,gender(社 會性別)還是等於sex(生理性別),但你若上網翻查一些新編的字典,gender 有很多解釋,而且不等於sex。法官的定義似乎過窄,不能滿足現實情况。但說到底,我還是同意法官的建議,交由立法會及政府制定合適的法例。」雖 然袁醫生從事變性手術已有廿載,但香港公營醫療系統回應跨性別社群的需要卻有三十年歷史。早在一九八○年,瑪麗醫院在本地著名性學家吳敏倫教授的穿針引線 下成立性診所,同年在診所下設「性別認同小組」,專門提供評估、輔導及轉介服務。袁醫生曾經擔任小組成員,與泌尿科、整形外科、婦科、遺傳學等專家及醫務 社會共事。可惜,二○○三年醫管局實施聯網制,將全港分為七個聯網,原本由「性別認同小組」專負的評估工作分散至各聯網內的精神科。不少求診者均抱怨,部 分精神科醫生對性別認同障礙以至整個評估、診斷和轉介的流程並不了解。「其實集中與分散處理各有好處,要視乎需求而定。若求診者眾,醫療服務當然愈普及愈 好,但假若人數稀少,集中處理可以善用資源。現在的情况屬後者,開設一至兩個專門處理性別認同障礙的診所便很夠足了。」

「對待跨性別這個社群,要同情、明白和體諒。不要視她∕他們做怪物,不要標籤。其實說到底跟一般病人無異。這個官司只是公眾教育的開始。」

的 確,變性手術牽涉複雜和跨越專科的知識和技術,更甚者是它關乎身體美學的主觀判斷,因此,要求醫生與準變性人有更好的溝通,共同協商打造一個怎樣的身體。 「我的習慣是請準變性人站在鏡前細想,如果你已經做了手術,你想像中的身體會是什麼模樣。她∕他要清楚自己想要什麼效果,而我便幫她∕他評估風險。很多人 以為MTF 的變性人都想有豐滿的乳房,其實是錯誤的想法,大部分寧可選擇較細小的,因為不想惹人注目,有了便已經滿足。」由男變女比女變男的手術容易,因為重建陰莖 牽涉較大風險,而愈追求有一定硬度、能站着小便的,手術就愈困難和危險。「重建陰莖有不同方法,若要求陰莖有一定硬度,方便性交和站着小便,便需要在前臂 或小腿割取皮膚組織,雖然可以有比較『像真』的陰莖,但會留下明顯而大範圍的疤痕,夏天便不能穿短袖衣服,所以取捨之下,大多會選擇傷害較少的方法。」

雖 說自己距離退休之齡尚有數年,不太擔心接班人的問題,但外科門類愈趨精細,要找到一位擁有跨越泌尿及整形外科兩門專業知識的醫生實非易事,最壞的情况是手 術要由兩組泌尿及整形外科的醫生同時進行。「沒有單一醫生做手術,兩組各自來自泌尿和整形外科的醫生也可以,只是希望能夠是同一組醫生處理變性手術,這樣 經驗才可以累積。」然而,這個折衷方案並非最理想,因為要同時集合兩組專科醫生,輪候手術的時間可能大大延長。

從瑪麗醫院轉到規模較細的律敦治醫院,袁維昌醫生反而找到更大的發展空間。「大型醫院每天需要進行很多危急的手術,對手術室需求量大,變性手術相較之下便不太急切。相反,這間小小的醫院,因為專科不多,手術室可以撥出較多時段予變性手術。」

在 一般醫院難得一見的公園裏拍過幾照硬照後,袁醫生一邊送我們離開,一邊回顧廿年的工作生涯。從書本裏紙上談兵到手術台上手起刀落,袁醫生替他自己也算不清 的人轉換性別,打造身體。初時免難失敗受挫,於是找參考書,自己再三推敲推敲。「能夠參與開發這個本地的醫療領域,我感到十分自豪。」臨別前,他不忘再三 叮囑: 「對待跨性別這個社群,要同情、明白和體諒。不要視她∕他們做怪物,不要標籤。她∕他們當中不乏痛苦經歷,遭遇可憐,其實說到底跟一般病人無異。這個官司 只是公眾教育的開始。」

延伸閱讀:
女同學社通色.通性-性傾向及性別身份認同通識教材http://leslovestudy.com/liberal-studies/

問  小曹女同學社執行幹事、中大性別研究博士候選人
答  袁維昌現時公立醫院唯一進行變性手術的醫生



Share |

基督徒之「基」督徒

.



如果基督的身體不包括同性戀者,
基督的身體就不再算是基督的身體呢?

如果我們經常認為同性戀者,只是娘娘腔而已,
我們有會否過份「標籤」呢?

其實同性戀者可否是教會的一部分呢?

Hallelujah Get out:http://www.facebook.com/pages/Hallel­ujah-Get-Out/122135927827393

Share |

2010年10月7日星期四

第二場《宗教右派》新書發佈及討論會

.
dp albert:
正在籌備第二場《宗教右派》新書發佈及討論會
是次與中大學生會合辦,
地點在民主女神像旁,
會探討宗教右派勢力怎樣介入
香港的教育,以至學界的場域,
而我們又可以怎麼樣捍衛教育和學術場域。
詳情日內公布。



Share |

America reveals its sexual secrets

 

America reveals its sexual secrets

Repressed? Hardly. The most comprehensive survey of American sex lives in 20 years reveals what's really going on in bed
Couple in bed 
The National Survey of Sexual Health and Behaviour reveals a more adventurous streak to sexual activity than previous studies. Photograph: Edvard March/Corbis There are 130 pages of it, most densely packed with statistics and the remainder couched in the kind of language that only the most erudite and obsessive of researchers could find remotely arousing. But the most comprehensive national survey of Americans' sex lives for nearly two decades – arguably the most revealing since Dr Alfred Kinsey's two now-celebrated reports some 60-odd years ago – throws up some fairly intriguing findings. And, as always with this kind of behavioural thing, if it's happening in the US, it's more than likely happening here too.

More than we ever used to, for example, we fancy a bit of this and a bit of that (or at least, we're prepared to own up to it). Not that we indulge in all 41 possible combinations of sex acts enumerated by the National Survey of Sexual Health and Behaviour (NSSHB), published yesterday in a special issue of the Journal of Sexual Medicine, every time we have sex. But we do seem to be getting considerably more adventurous: of the five basic acts identified by the study (penile-vaginal intercourse or PVI, solo masturbation, mutual masturbation, oral sex and anal sex), more than 6% of men aged 25-29 claimed to have indulged in each and every one the last time they slept with someone.

Well that, you may object, doesn't prove much. There will always be a small proportion of sexual acrobats (or men who think they are). But how to account for the 16% of women aged 18-24 who reckoned they used four of the five techniques the last time they had sex, or the 8% of women aged 50-59 who said the same thing? "The findings demonstrate the enormous variability that occurs in the sexual repertoire," concludes Debby Herbenick of Indiana University's Centre for Sexual Health Promotion, a leading author of the study of 5,865 US residents aged between 14 and 94. So while "vaginal intercourse was still the most common sexual behaviour" among adult men and women, more of them than ever before reported experiencing what the researchers romantically refer to as "sexual events" that did not feature any actual intercourse at all.

Herbenick puts this down mainly to "evolving and varying definitions of what it means to have 'had sex'". In other words, behaviour that was once considered mere foreplay, a kind of precursor or accessory to the main event – the starter, if you like – is increasingly becoming the main course. (And it is worth pointing out that the statistics above refer only to the respondents' last sexual experience, not necessarily to what they get up to when they are really setting out to have a good time).

Half a century ago, the writer Somerset Maugham opined that there is "hardly anyone whose sexual life, if it were broadcast, would not fill the world at large with surprise and horror". He may, finally, be right. The study doesn't delve much into the reasons why our sexual behaviour is evolving in this way. (Indeed, it may have ended up with some even more evolved behaviours – and probably a far larger number of sex act combinations – had it chosen to ask its respondents about their use of sex toys and pornography, which it didn't.) But nonetheless, the NSSHB pretty much puts paid to any lingering notions that repressed Anglo-Saxons are less adventurous in bed than, say, the Italians or French. The missionary position may not quite have died a death, but it's certainly no longer the beginning and end of what we now consider as sex.

Oral sex, for example, has become positively banal. Some 88% of men aged 30-39 have performed oral sex on a woman, 69% of them in the last year. Likewise, nearly 20% of boys aged 16-17. More than half of all women surveyed said they had received oral sex from a male partner in the previous year, while 12% of women aged 14-15, 23% aged 16-17 and well over half of those aged 18-49 said they had given a male partner oral sex.

Masturbation, likewise, is universal. Between 28% and 69% of men in each age group reported having masturbated alone during the past month; and solo masturbation emerged as the most common sex act among 14-24 year-old men and the over-50s. Among women, more than half aged 18-49 said they had masturbated alone in the previous 90 days, pretty much regardless of whether or not they were in a relationship. Nearly a quarter of all women said they had engaged in mutual masturbation with a male partner in the previous month.

Same-sex activity appears to be on the rise, or at least less taboo

 

More surprisingly, perhaps, the reported rate of anal sex has also increased dramatically, effectively doubling since the National Health and Social Life Survey was carried out by researchers from the University of Chicago in 1988. That study suggested around 12% of American women in the 25-29 age group had experienced anal sex in the last year; that figure has now risen to 21% (and also applies to the 30-39 age group). Some 20% of American 18- to 19-year-old girls have had anal sex at least once in their lifetimes, the new study shows, rising to more than 45% among 25-29 year olds.

Same-sex activity also appears to be on the rise, or at least less taboo (rather than through face-to-face interviews, the new survey was carried out online, a method believed to encourage more open and honest responses). While only about 7% of men and women identified themselves as "other than heterosexual", far more said they had engaged in some form of sexual activity with a member of the same sex. Nearly 15% of women in their 30s, for example, reported having performed oral sex on another woman at least once in their lifetime, while 13% of men over 40 said they had done the same to another man and 50% of men aged 50-59 said they had received it.

While we may be doing more stuff, though, we are not necessarily talking about it. According to Jocelyn Elders, the former US surgeon general, American society continues to view sex "primarily in negative terms"; she has used the report's evidence to argue for a more "open, frank conversation" in American society. "We have a sexually dysfunctional society because of our limited views of sexuality and our lack of knowledge and understanding concerning the complexities and joys of humanity," Elders writes in an introductory paper to the report. "We must revolutionise our conversation . . . to a discussion of pleasure."

Perhaps the most notable consequence of this expanded smorgasbord of sex does, though, appear to be that the whole business has become more pleasurable for women. While men were, on balance, more likely to reach orgasm during vaginal sex, women reported they were far more likely to if their partners adopted more than just one of the five basic techniques – and nearly 90% said they did so when they or their partner used all five. (More disturbingly, a startling number of women – almost a third – reported experiencing some form of genital pain during their most recent sexual encounter, against just 5% of men.)

Not that this more varied sexual diet and greater degree of female sexual satisfaction has done much to reduce the problem of what researchers call "the orgasm gap": in other words, the number of women who actually experience orgasm during sex, as opposed to the number of men who think they do. The NSSHB reports that 64% of women indicated they had reached orgasm in the course of their most recent "sexual event", whereas a fairly staggering 85% of men reported that their partner had done so during their most recent encounter. Some, of course, may have been having sex with other men, but that can hardly account for a 21% difference in perception.

 

Few young American teenagers seem to be having sex with anybody apart from themselves


There was more reassuring news, though, for those who fear that amid growing concern about teenage sexual development – much of it linked to mobile phone "sexting", social networking websites such as Facebook, and computer-based instant messaging services – very few young American teenagers seem to be having physical sex with anybody apart from themselves. Of the 14- to 16-year-old boys and girls surveyed, only around 10% said they were engaging in any kind of sexual activity with a partner – whereas 62% of boys, and 40% of girls, in the same age group were happy to admit to masturbating on their own during the last year.

The highest rate of condom use (the study was funded by the manufacturer of Trojan condoms) was also found to be among 14- to 17-year-olds. Nearly 80% of the boys and 69% of the girls surveyed said they used a condom the last time they had sex, against 25% for all the men in the study, leading the researchers to conclude that condom use had now become "the norm" among teens. Rates of condom use among black and Hispanic males were also considerably higher than among white men, perhaps showing that HIV-Aids awareness campaigns in these communities, where the disease is proportionately more prevalent, were making progress. "Our findings also show that condoms are used twice as often with casual sexual partners as with relationship partners, a trend that is consistent for both men and women across age groups that span 50 years," Herbenick said.

Cheering findings, too, for the over-60s: both men and women continue to be both active and adventurous in bed between the ages of 60 and 69, with 38% of men and 25% of women indicating they had been given oral sex by a partner of the opposite sex at some stage during the previous 12 months. Past 70, 19% or men and 8% of women reported they were still enjoying regular oral sex as part of their overall sexual activity. Somerset Maugham, one imagines, would be thrilled.


    文章轉貼自:http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/oct/05/sex-us-american-attitudes-survey


    Share |

    2010年10月4日星期一

    七折預訂《宗教右派》!!




    dirty press X 香港基督徒學會 聯合出版
    羅永生 X 龔立人 主編
    游靜、何春蕤 大力推薦


    馬國明、羅永生、龔立人、黃慧貞、李偉儀、沈旭暉、陳士齊、禤智偉、陳成斌、
    曹文傑、梁偉怡、楊穎仁、譚得志、秦晞輝 等著

    究竟香港基右是怎麼回事?正是本書要認真處理的課題。它史無前例地從階級意識、政治哲學及政治形勢分析、科學哲學、批判神學、酷兒政治、行動實踐及個人經驗反思等不同進路,爬梳了香港基右各種意識型態的承傳及轉化,與近年的發展脈絡,對於一直相信可以獨善其身、或助長了基右也不自知的基督徒,與仍然大惑不解、自以為無染原罪的非基督徒來說,都應是必讀的入門課本。
    游靜 香港嶺南大學文化研究系副教授

    本書展現香港知識份子並未止於簡化式的批判和譴責,作者們很嚴肅地、慎重地針對被稱為「香港宗教右派」的興起進行了深刻的分析,對香港本地特有的政經結構溯源,對宗教右派在殖民體系與西方信仰中逐步茁壯的前世,與佔盡階級優勢且充斥政治慾望的今生,都提出了詳盡的歷史社會政治分析,不但揭露其呼應全球保守勢力的擴張野心,也指出某些香港宗教群體與本地先後建制勾結合謀的悠長歷史。
    何春蕤 台灣中央大學性別研究室召集人


    出版日期:201010月20日
    ISBN978-988-17969-2-9
    售價:HK$120
    頁數:304


    十月四日前直接預訂及完成付款可獲七折優惠(HK$84)!!


    預訂方法

    ==================================
    主題:預訂《宗教右派》
    姓名:
    地址:
    電話:
    數量:___本
    取書方式(請選一項):
    1. 掛號($22@)/速遞($15-30@)
    2. 交收地點:旺角站/佐敦站;或
    3. 辦公時間自取:香港基督徒學會旺角道11號藝旺商業大廈10)。
    ==================================


    二、電話預訂:
    香港基督徒學會 2398 1699
    dirty press 6058 8944 / 6694 9303














    ───────更多資訊───────


    香港基督徒學會            http://www.hkci.org.hk/news/index.html


    dirty press                       http://dirty-press.blogspot.com/











    書籍銷售資訊

    書籍銷售資訊 【總代理】 ➡ ️   台灣: 唐山 / 正港 https://www.facebook.com/TonsanBookstore 【伙伴書店】 ➡ ️   香港 序言: http://www.hkreaders.com ...